Tag: psychology

Keyboard Diseases: How Hidden Hands Are Rewiring Our Minds

by Dr. David Orman

We live in an age where many of us are healthier in body than ever before but what about the health of how we think, act, and engage with others? There is a subtle epidemic, one with no physical symptoms yet capable of warping character, relationships, and the very way we see truth. I call them “keyboard diseases.” They compulsive online behaviors that destroy empathy, distort courage, and replace authentic action with keyboard echo. In the grip of this, we drift from being human to being a keyboard, typing out versions of ourselves we barely recognize.

Here are examples of this:

At first glance, cell-phone addiction seems benign, a modern (in)convenience. But it is not neutral. Every ping, every notification, pulls attention away from the sweet Now. Like an itch we cannot help scratching, our thumbs swipe, our focus splinters, and presence recedes. Then comes the hidden rant: the furious keyboard warrior who would never speak such things in person yet fires off messages when behind the safety of screens, comforted by distance and anonymity. Add to that the darker seeds: plotting harm, orchestrating divisive narratives, and using digital tools to hide intentions. These are not fringe phenomena—they are daily nuisances, internal viruses eating at virtue and clarity.

Beyond them lies another terrain, that of digital vigilantism and “echo chambers.” We now have armies of moral judges ready to pounce via screenshots, threads, and mass shaming. What starts as righteous indignation quickly becomes ritual bloodletting. Parallel to that, we collapse into echo chambers where the subtle is erased and complexity punished. We only share what confirms what we believe, we only hear what soothes our self-image. It someone disagrees, the mass of nasty verbiage comes raining down from the hidden keyboard.

And then there is doomscroll dependency, the addictive consumption of negative, fear-laden content. We ride each headline like a wave of anxiety, honing a worldview in which everything is crisis, betrayal, and collapse.

To understand why so many fall prey, we can learn a great deal from behavior science, especially the work of one of my favorites, Chase Hughes. Hughes, a former military intelligence officer turned behavior specialist, teaches that much of what we believe is our free choice is shaped (often invisibly) by how we process others, how we read signals, how we allow fear and insecurity to lead us. He teaches tools like the Behavioral Table of Elements (a framework for observing nonverbal cues, clusters of stress, and patterns of deception). He emphasizes that communication is not just in the words, but in posture, eye movement, voice tonality, all tools that both others and we ourselves use to influence perception.

This helps explain why “keyboard diseases” take root so easily. Behind the keyboard, people hide much (all?) of the nonverbal self. They strip away the cues that force accountability: the eyes that look away, the voice that quivers. They amplify what they think but rarely test, choosing content that confirms rather than challenges.

People then are easier targets for manipulation, both by others and by ourselves, because we believe our own posture is safe, our own rationality intact. Hughes warns of the “firewall illusion,” the false belief that one is immune to manipulation; ironically, believing that makes us more vulnerable.

Yet there is hope. Recognizing these “keyboard diseases” is the first step back to integrity. We can begin to reclaim our humanity by slowing down, by insisting on face-to-face communication from time to time, by stepping into conversation rather than comment threads. We can practice observing behavior, ours first, then others, like Hughes suggests. Notice how we sit, how we look, what our default gaze is, journaling small signals of discomfort or fear. We can challenge ourselves to consume what uplifts, not only what enrages. We can question what we share, and to pause before we type.

In the end, we are more than keyboards, more than screens or threads. We are bodies, minds, hearts — responsive, relational, vulnerable. These “keyboard diseases” steal from us not just civility, but presence, compassion, and the subtle courage of living fully. To heal, we need to put the keyboard in its proper place and recognize it as a tool, not a refuge. A mirror, not a mask. A servant, not a sovereign. Returning to that posture may seem small. But it is the ground on which true transformation grows.

It is the key to returning to a heart driven, compassionate society.

Part 2: From A Western Psychological View of Rejoicing in Violence

by Dr. David Orman

From a psychological standpoint, celebrating or enjoying the killing of someone purely for holding a different political view often stems from dehumanization and moral disengagement. When people begin to view opponents not as human beings but as dangerous “others” or as symbols of a hated ideology, empathy is switched off. This process allows individuals to perceive violence as justified—or even virtuous—because they believe the target represents a threat to their identity, values, or group survival. Social media echo chambers and polarizing news sources can intensify this effect by amplifying anger and portraying the other side as an existential enemy rather than as complex human beings.

A second factor is authoritarian or extremist thinking, which thrives on rigid black-and-white worldviews. People with these traits often crave certainty, hierarchy, and a simple moral order. Political opponents are seen not merely as people with different opinions but as “evil” forces to be eradicated. This mindset can create a psychological environment where violence feels not just acceptable but heroic, especially if the person believes they are protecting their in-group or a sacred cause. When combined with personal grievances, resentment, or feelings of powerlessness, this belief system can turn abstract hatred into a desire for literal harm.

There is also a strong emotional and identity component. For some, political identity becomes a core part of self-definition. When that identity feels threatened, the brain can react as though under physical attack, triggering fight-or-flight chemistry—adrenaline, cortisol, and aggressive impulses. In this heightened state, moral reasoning weakens and celebration of violence can feel like emotional vindication. Research shows that witnessing harm to an out-group can even activate the brain’s reward circuits if the person strongly identifies with an opposing group and perceives the harm as retribution.

Finally, social reinforcement and cultural narratives play a critical role. If peers, online communities, or influential figures applaud or glorify violence, individuals receive validation for destructive feelings. Over time, repeated exposure to such reinforcement dulls natural empathy and normalizes brutality. In this way, celebrating the murder of someone with different political views is rarely about politics alone; it is the end result of psychological processes—dehumanization, rigid thinking, threatened identity, and group validation—that strip away empathy and elevate aggression into a twisted form of moral triumph.